Saturday, May 11, 2019

Critiquing a mixed-method study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Critiquing a mixed-method study - Essay ExampleBecause it allocates m whizy for expensive operations on the elderly. such(prenominal) a statement indeed rises up a lot of comments and touches a lot of conflicting attitudes. For one thing it back tooth easily slip into the political arena. The point is that the statement draws upon an important issue the unify States is presently facing, the expense of health guard. It makes this point as it draws up another important issue, that of the sanctity of sprightliness and ones ultimate responsibility in medical care which is to respect that sanctity. Getting back to the theme, apparently the touch on which the bind lies upon is one shared among several countries in the westerly world. A recent World wellness Publication revealed that in some countries the health system would not think twice about transfer a kidney to an elderly person. thither was a recent program on the radio in which the southwestern African health care system spe cifically denied such transplants to older age groups. The point is that there are pre-understandings behind the Goodridge et al article and they definitely lie upon or assume a western system of values. Is this okay? What does this mean? For one thing this means that there is no disembo breachd intellect as Horsburgh points out. There is no neutrality here that could take in the position of countries outside the Western realm, such as South Africa. But this view doesnt say the study is wrong on in fault. It simply means, as Flemmings points out, ones knowledge does come from our social interaction and experiences, and, from then stance of this article, these happen to eliminate in the Western world. The dominant theme in the United States part of this western World happens to be sensitive questions dealing with health care. Hence the main research question would immediately become suspect, as it would recall the political sphere where such confusing issues as death panels were ra ised. But it is not the United States. The article is based on Canadian experiences. But still, there is a hidden confidence in the article. The assumption is that quality of care can be measureable as significant when one is dying in an intense care unit and when one is dying of an obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The assumption appears that life can be extended in the case of COPD. Life should, of course, when possible, be extended. It is an assumption that is usually accepted. It is important that this assumption, and if it lies alike in the authors, be reflexibly revealed. What would the hypothesis of this article be? Would it be that the care needs of people with COPD who discover in the ICU are different from the care needs of people receiving end of life (EOL) care who die in critical care settings without COPD? One cannot be sure. This is a mixed methods study, combining both qualitative and duodecimal data. The authors seek to measure the quality of EOL care in th e ICU, but have many argufys. One challenge is that the ICU patients experience altered cognition and are unable to participate directly in quality of care assessments. 2. The literature review is concerned with describing the difficult state of the patients. It speaks of how depression, anxiety and other illness contributed to the comorbidity state of the patients, explaining the complexity of the care provided. The background reviews literature dealing with the many issues concerning EOL critical

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.